New: A Collection of Poems from the Goshen Workshop, April 2004
Notes Toward a Syllabus
Engl
312 Poetry Workshop
I see no
reason to spend your life writing poems unless your goal is to write
great poems. -Donald Hall |
I
must be willing to fail. If I am to keep
on writing, I cannot bother to insist on high standards. I
must get into action and not let anything stop me, or even slow me much.
-William Stafford |
-Julia Kasdorf |
NOTE: the particular
activities noted here will quite likely be adjusted/altered as we go.
But
please make careful note of the times and plan to attend all sessions.
Morning:
Part 1: Introductions (personal/poetic)
Procedures and processes
Working with each other, and each other’s words
Part 2: Looking before and after
Generating new work
Writing Exercise #1
Afternoon:
Writing Exercise #2
Workshop
Poetry
walk,
weather permitting
Assignment: Revise/rework
exercises, bring copies of 2 new poems on Tuesday
Tuesday, April 27: Class time 9-12,
Morning
Part 1:Workshop poems from Monday
Part 2: Continue workshop
Prose about poetry: manifestos and definitions
Afternoon:
Exercise #3 and . . .
Night
poetry hike,
Exercise #4
Assignment: Revise
and rework, bring copies of 2 new poems on Wed.
Wednesday, April 28: Class time 2-4
Workshop poems from Tuesday
Exercise #5
Assignments: One More
Poem!?
Further Decisions and
Revisions
Thursday, April 29: Class time 2-4
Workshop; Polishing; Performing; ??
Grand Finale Reading by
class
members,
Friday, April 30: Portfolio conferences 2-??
Learning from Strangers. Get to know a poet (or
more than
one) who’s really outside your orbit, who does things that seem really
alien
and odd to you.
Read through a book of his/her poems, and then rewrite one of your poems, or write a new poem, using some of his/her modes and tricks.
If you feel inclined, write your own brief or expansive manifesto.
http://www.bartleby.com/39/36.html
Wordsworth, “Preface to Lyrical Ballads.”
The principal object, then, proposed in these
Poems was to
choose incidents and situations from common life, and to relate or
describe
them, throughout, as far as was possible in a selection of language
really used
by men, and, at the same time, to throw over them a certain colouring
of
imagination, whereby ordinary things should be presented to the mind in
an
unusual aspect; and, further, and above all, to make these incidents
and
situations interesting by tracing in them, truly though not
ostentatiously, the
primary laws of our nature: chiefly, as far as regards the manner in
which we
associate ideas in a state of excitement. Humble and rustic life was
generally
chosen, because, in that condition, the essential passions of the heart
find a
better soil in which they can attain their maturity, are less under
restraint,
and speak a plainer and more emphatic language; because in that
condition of
life our elementary feelings coexist in a state of greater simplicity,
and,
consequently, may be more accurately contemplated, and more forcibly
communicated; because the manners of rural life germinate from those
elementary
feelings, and, from the necessary character of rural occupations, are
more
easily comprehended, and are more durable; and, lastly, because in that
condition the passions of men are incorporated with the beautiful and
permanent
forms of nature.
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/shelley-poetry.html
Shelley, “A Defence of Poetry.”
But poets, or those who imagine and express this
indestructible order, are not only the authors of language and of
music, of the
dance, and architecture, and statuary, and painting: they are the
institutors
of laws, and the founders of civil society, and the inventors of the
arts of
life, and the teachers, who draw into a certain propinquity with the
beautiful
and the true that partial apprehension of the agencies of the invisible
world
which is called religion. Hence all original religions are allegorical,
or
susceptible of allegory, and, like Janus, have a double face of false
and true.
Poets, according to the circumstances of the age and nation in which
they
appeared, were called, in the earlier epochs of the world, legislators,
or
prophets: a poet essentially comprises and unites both these
characters. For he
not only beholds intensely the present as it is, and discovers those
laws
according to which present things ought to be ordered, but he beholds
the
future in the present, and his thoughts are the germs of the flower and
the
fruit of latest time.
http://www.galegroup.com/free_resources/poets/bio/dickinson_e.htm
Emily Dickinson on poetry
"If I read a book and it makes my whole body so
cold no
fire ever can warm me, I know that is poetry. If I feel physically as
if the
top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry. These are the
only ways I
know it. Is there any other way?"
http://www.bartleby.com/39/45.html
Walt Whitman, “Preface to Leaves of Grass”
The greatest poet hardly knows
pettiness or
triviality. If he breathes into anything that was before thought small
it
dilates with the grandeur and life of the universe. He is a seer … he
is
individual … he is complete in himself … the others are as good as he,
only he
sees it and they do not. He is not one of the chorus … he does not stop
for any
regulation … he is the president of regulation. What the eyesight does
to the
rest he does to the rest. Who knows the curious mystery of the
eyesight? The
other senses corroborate themselves, but this is removed from any proof
but its
own and foreruns the identities of the spiritual world. A single glance
of it
mocks all the investigations of man and all the instruments and books
of the
earth and all reasoning. What is marvellous? what is unlikely? what is
impossible or baseless or vague? after you have once just opened the
space of a
peachpit and given audience to far and near and to the sunset and had
all
things enter with electric swiftness softly and duly without confusion
or
jostling or jam.
http://www.poetspath.com/transmissions/messages/ohara.html
Frank O’Hara, “Personism, a Manifesto”
Everything is in the poems, but at the risk of
sounding like
the poor wealthy man’s Allen Ginsberg I will write to you because I
just heard
that one of my fellow poets thinks that a poem of mine that can’t be
got at one
reading is because I was confused too. Now, come on. I don’t believe in
god, so
I don’t have to make elaborately sounded structures. I hate Vachel
Lindsay,
always have, I don’t even like rhythm, assonance, all that stuff. You
just go
on your nerve. If someone’s chasing you down the street with a knife
you just
run, you don’t turn around and shout, "Give it up! I was a track star
for
Mineola Prep."
http://poetry.about.com/library/weekly/aa080597.htm
Ezra Pound, Tenets of Imagism
THE TENETS
http://www.musicpsyche.org/Lorca-Duende.htm
Federico Garcia Lorca on the Duende
These black sounds are the mystery, the roots that probe through the
mire
that we all know of, and do not understand, but which furnishes us with
whatever is sustaining in art. Black sounds: so said the
celebrated
Spaniard, thereby concurring with Goethe, who, in effect, defined the duende
when he said, speaking of Paganini: "A mysterious power that all may
feel
and no philosophy can explain."
The duende, then, is a power and not a construct, is a
struggle and
not a concept. I have heard an old guitarist, a true virtuoso,
remark,
"The duende is not in the throat, the duende comes up
from
inside, up from the very soles of the feet." That is to say, it
is
not a question of aptitude, but of a true and viable style - of blood,
in other
words; of what is oldest in culture: of creation made act.
This "mysterious power that all may feel and no philosophy can
explain," is, in sum, the earth-force, the same duende that
fired
the heart of Nietzsche, who sought it in its external forms on the
Rialto
Bridge, or in the music of Bizet, without ever finding it, or
understanding
that the duende he pursued had rebounded from the
mystery-minded Greeks
to the Dancers of Cádiz or the gored, Dionysian cry of
Silverio's siguiriya.
http://www.unknown.nu/futurism/manifesto.html
Marinetti’s Futurist Manifesto
· We intend to sing the love of danger, the
habit of energy and fearlessness.
· Courage, audacity, and revolt will be
essential elements of our poetry.
· Up to now literature has exalted a pensive
immobility, ecstasy, and sleep. We intend to exalt aggresive action, a
feverish
insomnia, the racer’s stride, the mortal leap, the punch and the slap.
· We affirm that the world’s magnificence has
been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. A racing car whose
hood is
adorned with great pipes, like serpents of explosive breath—a roaring
car that
seems to ride on grapeshot is more beautiful than the Victory of
· We want to hymn the man at the wheel, who
hurls the lance of his spirit across the Earth, along the circle of its
orbit.
· The poet must spend himself with ardor,
splendor, and generosity, to swell the enthusiastic fervor of the
primordial elements.
· Except in struggle, there is no more beauty.
No work without an aggressive character can be a masterpiece. Poetry
must be
conceived as a violent attack on unknown forces, to reduce and
prostrate them
before man.
· We stand on the last promontory of the
centuries!... Why should we look back, when what we want is to break
down the
mysterious doors of the Impossible? Time and Space died yesterday. We
already
live in the absolute, because we have created eternal, omnipresent
speed.
· We will glorify war—the world’s only
hygiene—militarism, patriotism, the destructive gesture of
freedom-bringers,
beautiful ideas worth dying for, and scorn for woman.
· We will destroy the museums, libraries,
academies of every kind, will fight moralism, feminism, every
opportunistic or
utilitarian cowardice.
· We will sing of great crowds excited by work,
by pleasure, and by riot; we will sing of the multicolored, polyphonic
tides of
revolution in the modern capitals; we will sing of the vibrant nightly
fervor
of arsenals and shipyards blazing with violent electric moons; greedy
railway
stations that devour smoke-plumed serpents; factories hung on clouds by
the
crooked lines of their smoke; bridges that stride the rivers like giant
gymnasts, flashing in the sun with a glitter of knives; adventurous
steamers
that sniff the horizon; deep-chested locomotives whose wheels paw the
tracks
like the hooves of enormous steel horses bridled by tubing; and the
sleek
flight of planes whose propellers chatter in the wind like banners and
seem to
cheer like an enthusiastic crowd.
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1925surrealism.html
Surrealist manifesto of Jan. 1925
With regard to a false interpretation of our enterprise, stupidly
circulated
among the public, We declare as follows to the entire braying literary,
dramatic, philosophical, exegetical and even theological body of
contemporary
criticism:
Bureaus de Recherches Surréalistes,
15, Rue de Grenelle Signed: Louis
Aragon, Antonin Artaud, Jacques Baron, Joë Bousquet, J.-A.
Boiffard, André
Breton, Jean Carrive, René Crevel, Robert Desnos, Paul
Élaurd, Max Ernst, et
al.
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/Classes/Jbutler/T340/SurManifesto/ManifestoOfSurrealism.htm
Breton’s First Manifesto of Surrealism , 1924
SURREALISM, n. Psychic automatism in its pure state, by
which one
proposes to express -- verbally, by means of the written word, or in
any other
manner -- the actual functioning of thought. Dictated by the thought,
in the
absence of any control exercised by reason, exempt from any aesthetic
or moral
concern.
ENCYCLOPEDIA. Philosophy. Surrealism is based on the belief
in the
superior reality of certain forms of previously neglected associations,
in the
omnipotence of dream, in the disinterested play of thought. It tends to
ruin
once and for all all other psychic mechanisms and to substitute itself
for them
in solving all the principal problems of life.
http://www.391.org/manifestos/tristantzara_dadamanifesto.htm
Dada Manifesto by Tristan Tzara, 1918
I'm writing this manifesto to show that you can perform contrary
actions at
the same time, in one single, fresh breath; I am against action; as for
continual contradiction, and affirmation too, I am neither for nor
against
them, and I won't explain myself because I hate common sense.
DADA - this is a word that throws up ideas so that they can be shot
down;
every bourgeois is a little playwright, who invents different subjects
and who,
instead of situating suitable characters on the level of his own
intelligence,
like chrysalises on chairs, tries to find causes or objects (according
to
whichever psychoanalytic method he practices) to give weight to his
plot, a
talking and self-defining story. *
Every spectator is a plotter, if he tries to explain a word (to
know!) From
his padded refuge of serpentine complications, he allows his instincts
to be
manipulated. Whence the sorrows of conjugal life.
To be plain: The amusement of redbellies in the mills of empty
skulls.
DADA
DOES NOT MEAN ANYTHING
http://www.391.org/manifestos/tristantzara_dmonflabl.htm
Dada Manifesto on Feeble and Bitter Love by Tristan Tzara
Is poetry necessary? I know that those who shout
loudest
against it are actually preparing a comfortable perfection for it; they
call it
the Future Hygienic.
People envisage the (ever-impending) annihilation of art. Here they are
looking
for a more art-like art. Hygiene becomes mygod mygod purity.
Must we no longer believe in words? Since when do they express the
contrary of
what the organ that utters them things and wants?* Herein
lies the
great secret:
Thought is made in the mouth.
I still consider myself very likeable.
http://www.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/2002dec/gundy_essay.php
Heresy and the Individual Talent by Jeff Gundy
1. The Union of Surrealist Anabaptists proclaims the fusion of dream
and
reality into a surreality that contains both dream and reality, chaos
and
order, faith and doubt, past and future, culminating in the
instantiation,
reification, obfuscation, and final transcendence of all binary
dualisms
everywhere, hallelujah, amen.
2. All human beings, and all interested animals, plants and other
creatures,
are immediately declared both members in good standing of the Union of
Anabaptist Surrealists and perpetually and simultaneously under its
ban, as
both eternally innocent and originally sinful. It is hoped that this
dual and
non-negotiable status for all will make schisms and internal turmoil
more
difficult if not impossible.
Donald Barthelme,
“Not-Knowing” (I couldn’t find
a good web source for this essay, but here are a couple of passages.
It’s been
reprinted in various places, including Georgia
Review.
"Writing is a process of
dealing with
not-knowing, a forcing of what and how.... The not-knowing is crucial
to art,
is what permits art to be made. Without the scanning process engendered
by
not-knowing, without the possibility of having the mind move in
unanticipated
directions, there would be no invention.... The not-knowing is not
simple,
because it's hedged about with prohibitions, roads that may not be
taken. The
more serious the artist, the more problems he takes into account and
the more
considerations limit his possible initiatives."
--Donald Barthelme,
"Not-Knowing"
"What is magical about the
object is that
it at once invites and resists interpretation. Its artistic worth is
measurable
by the degree to which it remains, after interpretation, vital -- no
interpretation or cardiopulmonary push-pull can exhaust or empty it."
-- "Not-Knowing"